Recently, the latest investment banks league tables and rankings have been released, providing insightful reference for job seekers and companies looking to work with investment banks. This article will analyze the global investment banks rankings from different dimensions.

JP Morgan Chase Tops League Tables, Replacing Goldman Sachs
According to the latest global investment banking revenue rankings from Financial Times, JP Morgan has surpassed Goldman Sachs to become the No.1 investment bank. JP Morgan generated global banking fees of $6.4 billion in the past 12 months. The key driving force was its Fixed Income, Currencies and Commodities division, which produced $15.4 billion in revenues. Goldman Sachs came in second place with $5.7 billion in fees, losing the top spot it held last year. Morgan Stanley and Citi rounded out the top investment banks on the global fee table.
Goldman Sachs Still Leads in M&A, Equity Capital Markets
While JP Morgan leads in overall investment banking revenues, Goldman Sachs remains No.1 in Mergers & Acquisitions advisory and Equity Capital Markets underwriting. It advised on $1.9 billion worth of M&A deals and captured $3.8 billion in equity underwriting fees. Morgan Stanley and JP Morgan took 2nd and 3rd place in the Equity Capital Markets ranking. In Debt Capital Markets underwriting, Citi and HSBC topped the league tables globally.
China Makes Inroads on Global Investment Banking Tables
An interesting observation is the rise of Chinese investment banks on global league tables, reflecting China’s growing influence. China International Capital Corporation broke into the top 10 bookrunners for Global Equity Capital Markets. Meanwhile, Citic Securities climbed to 4th place in the Global Emerging Markets Equity Capital Markets ranking. However, Chinese firms still have a long way to go to truly compete with Wall Street titans.
League Tables Vary by Region, Best Firms Dominate Top Ranks
While the overall league tables provide a snapshot of global investment banking strength, the rankings differ by region. For instance, Citi leads the Asia Pacific (ex-Japan) M&A ranking, while Barclays tops the same table for Europe. And despite some movement, the top ranks continue to be dominated by the usual suspects – Goldman, JP Morgan, Morgan Stanley, Citi, and Bank of America. They have the scale and capabilities to handle complex cross-border transactions.
League Tables Are Useful But Have Limitations
In summary, the investment banks league tables serve as a helpful annual report card on their performance. But it is also important to recognize their limitations. Rankings focus mainly on revenue size, but do not consider profitability or returns. The mix of deals and clients also matters. Tables can fluctuate year-to-year based on market conditions. Prestige and competitiveness are also not fully captured in the numbers. Still, they provide insightful data points for companies and job seekers evaluating investment banks.
The latest investment banks league tables and rankings provide insightful reference on the global market share and relative strengths of top investment banks. While fluctuations happen annually, the top ranks remain dominated by seasoned Wall Street firms like JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, Morgan Stanley, Citi and Bank of America. At the same time, Chinese investment banks are rising quickly, reflecting the country’s growing influence in global finance.